Hyperlacticaemia in children with status asthmaticus. The Stewart approach.

BACKGROUND: Patients with status asthmaticus (SA) frequently present with lactic acidosis (LA). Our goal is to identify the nature of this LA using the Stewart physicochemical model and to identify the independent factors associated with LA in children with SA. METHODS: Analytical study of a retrospective cohort using a nested case-control design. Twenty-eight episodes of SA in 24 children were included. Patients admitted to a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) for SA over a 9-year period were recruited consecutively. Data were analysed using the Stewart model and the Strong Ion Calculator. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and regression models were fitted within the general linear model. RESULTS: Hyperlacticaemia (Lact[mM/L] = 3.905 [95% CI = 3.018-4.792]) and acidosis (pH = 7.294 [95% CI = 7.241-7.339]) were observed in 18 episodes (15 patients; 62.5%). According to the Stewart model, acidosis was caused by a decrease in strong ion difference. Initially, pCO2 was high (pCO2[mmHg] = 45.806 [95% CI = 37.314-54.298]) but the net unmeasured ion (NUI) component was normal (NUI=-4,461 [95% CI=-3.51 - -5.412]), and neither changed significantly over the clinical course. There was no need to determine pyruvate, as the NUI was normal and the LA was type B (non-hypoxic, lactate / pyruvate < 25). We observed a correlation (p = 0.023) between LA and intramuscular epinephrine administered on arrival at hospital, but not between LA and the cumulative dose of nebulized salbutamol. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with SA presented LA. The Stewart model confirmed that LA is not hypoxic, probably due to sympathomimetic-related glycolysis.

OLA strategy for ARDS: Its effect on mortality depends on achieved recruitment (PaO2/FiO2) and mechanical power. Systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression / Estrategia OLA para el SDRA: su efecto en la mortalidad depende del reclutamiento alcanzado (PaO2/FiO2) y la potencia mecánica. Revisión sistemática y metaanálisis con metarregresión

Objective: The “Open Lung Approach” (OLA), that includes high levels of positive end-expiratory pressure coupled with limited tidal volumes, is considered optimal for adult patients with ARDS. However, many previous meta-analyses have shown only marginal benefits of OLA on mortality but with statistical heterogeneity. It is crucial to identify the most likely moderators of this effect. To determine the effect of OLA strategy on mortality of ventilated ARDS patients. We hypothesized that the degree of recruitment achieved in the control group (PaO2/FiO2 ratio on day 3 of ventilation), and the difference in Mechanical Power (MP) or Driving Pressure (DP) between experimental and control groups will be the most likely sources of heterogeneity. Design: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA statement and registered in PROSPERO database. We searched only for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). GRADE guidelines were used for rating the quality of evidence. Publication bias was assessed. For the Meta-analysis, we used a Random Effects Model. Sources of heterogeneity were explored with Meta-Regression, using a priori proposed set of possible moderators. For model comparison, Akaike's Information Criterion with the finite sample correction (AICc) was used. Patients: Fourteen RCTs were included in the study. Results: Evidence of publication bias was detected, and quality of evidence was downgraded. Pooled analysis did not show a significant difference in the 28-day mortality between OLA strategy and control groups. Overall risk of bias was low. The analysis detected statistical heterogeneity. The two “best” explicative meta-regression models were those that used control PaO2/FiO2 on day 3 and difference in MP between experimental and control groups. The DP and MP models were highly correlated. Conclusions: There is no clear benefit of OLA strategy on mortality of ARDS patients, with significant heterogeneity among RCTs. ... (AU)

Objetivo: La Estrategia Open Lung (EOL), que incluye niveles elevados de presión positiva teleespiratoria junto con volumen corriente bajo, es considerada como el «patrón oro» para los pacientes adultos con SDRA. Sin embargo, varios metaanálisis previos han mostrado únicamente beneficios marginales de la EOL en la disminución de la mortalidad, aunque con gran heterogeneidad estadística. Es crucial identificar los moderadores más probables, así como determinar el efecto de la estrategia EOL en la mortalidad de los pacientes ventilados con SDRA. La hipótesis fue que el grado de reclutamiento alcanzado en el grupo control (cociente PaO2/FiO2 en el día3 de ventilación) y la diferencia en potencia mecánica (MP) o driving pressure (DP) entre el grupo experimental y el grupo control son la fuente más probable de heterogeneidad. Diseño Se realizó una revisión sistemática y metaanálisis de acuerdo con la declaración PRISMA, y se registró en la base de datos PROSPERO (N.° CRD42020179778). Se seleccionaron únicamente ensayos clínicos aleatorizados (ECA). Se estratificó la calidad de la evidencia de acuerdo con la metodología GRADE. Se evaluó el sesgo de publicación. Para el metaanálisis se utilizó el modelo de efectos aleatorios. Se exploraron las fuentes de heterogeneidad mediante metarregresión utilizando a priori un conjunto establecido de posibles moderadores. Para el modelo de comparación se utilizó el criterio de información de Akaike con la corrección para muestras pequeñas (AICc). Pacientes Se incluyeron 14 ECA en el estudio. Resultados Se detectó un sesgo de publicación, y la calidad fue degradada. El análisis combinado no mostró una diferencia estadísticamente significativa en la mortalidad en el día28 entre la estrategia EOL y los grupos control. El riesgo total de sesgo fue bajo. El análisis detectó heterogeneidad estadística. ... (AU)

OLA strategy for ARDS: Its effect on mortality depends on achieved recruitment (PaO2/FiO2) and mechanical power. Systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression.

OBJECTIVE: The "Open Lung Approach" (OLA), that includes high levels of positive end-expiratory pressure coupled with limited tidal volumes, is considered optimal for adult patients with ARDS. However, many previous meta-analyses have shown only marginal benefits of OLA on mortality but with statistical heterogeneity. It is crucial to identify the most likely moderators of this effect. To determine the effect of OLA strategy on mortality of ventilated ARDS patients. We hypothesized that the degree of recruitment achieved in the control group (PaO2/FiO2 ratio on day 3 of ventilation), and the difference in Mechanical Power (MP) or Driving Pressure (DP) between experimental and control groups will be the most likely sources of heterogeneity. DESIGN: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA statement and registered in PROSPERO database. We searched only for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). GRADE guidelines were used for rating the quality of evidence. Publication bias was assessed. For the Meta-analysis, we used a Random Effects Model. Sources of heterogeneity were explored with Meta-Regression, using a priori proposed set of possible moderators. For model comparison, Akaike's Information Criterion with the finite sample correction (AICc) was used. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENTS: Fourteen RCTs were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Not applicable. RESULTS: Evidence of publication bias was detected, and quality of evidence was downgraded. Pooled analysis did not show a significant difference in the 28-day mortality between OLA strategy and control groups. Overall risk of bias was low. The analysis detected statistical heterogeneity. The two "best" explicative meta-regression models were those that used control PaO2/FiO2 on day 3 and difference in MP between experimental and control groups. The DP and MP models were highly correlated. CONCLUSIONS: There is no clear benefit of OLA strategy on mortality of ARDS patients, with significant heterogeneity among RCTs. Mortality effect of OLA is mediated by lung recruitment and mechanical power.

OLA strategy for ARDS: Its effect on mortality depends on achieved recruitment (PaO2/FiO2) and mechanical power. Systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression.

OBJECTIVE: The "Open Lung Approach" (OLA), that includes high levels of positive end-expiratory pressure coupled with limited tidal volumes, is considered optimal for adult patients with ARDS. However, many previous meta-analyses have shown only marginal benefits of OLA on mortality but with statistical heterogeneity. It is crucial to identify the most likely moderators of this effect. To determine the effect of OLA strategy on mortality of ventilated ARDS patients. We hypothesized that the degree of recruitment achieved in the control group (PaO2/FiO2 ratio on day 3 of ventilation), and the difference in Mechanical Power (MP) or Driving Pressure (DP) between experimental and control groups will be the most likely sources of heterogeneity. DESIGN: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA statement and registered in PROSPERO database. We searched only for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). GRADE guidelines were used for rating the quality of evidence. Publication bias was assessed. For the Meta-analysis, we used a Random Effects Model. Sources of heterogeneity were explored with Meta-Regression, using a priori proposed set of possible moderators. For model comparison, Akaike's Information Criterion with the finite sample correction (AICc) was used. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENTS: Fourteen RCTs were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Not applicable. RESULTS: Evidence of publication bias was detected, and quality of evidence was downgraded. Pooled analysis did not show a significant difference in the 28-day mortality between OLA strategy and control groups. Overall risk of bias was low. The analysis detected statistical heterogeneity. The two "best" explicative meta-regression models were those that used control PaO2/FiO2 on day 3 and difference in MP between experimental and control groups. The DP and MP models were highly correlated. CONCLUSIONS: There is no clear benefit of OLA strategy on mortality of ARDS patients, with significant heterogeneity among RCTs. Mortality effect of OLA is mediated by lung recruitment and mechanical power.

Safety of aerosol therapy in children during noninvasive ventilation with helmet and total face mask / Seguridad de la aerosolterapia durante la ventilación mecánica no invasiva con helmet y mascarilla facial total en población pediátrica

Purpose: To evaluate the consequences of using nebulized drugs in patients subjected to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) with total face mask (TFM) and helmet. Design: A descriptive analytical study of a prospective patient cohort was carried out. Ambit: Pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a tertiary hospital. Patients: Consecutive sampling was used to include all patients admitted to the PICU and requiring NIV with helmet or TFM over a period of 29 months. No patients were excluded. Interventions: Nebulized treatment was added according to medical criteria. Variables of interest: Independent variables were age, sex, diagnosis, disease severity, ventilation parameters and nebulized drugs (if administered). Secondary outcomes were duration and failure of NIV, and length of PICU stay. Results: The most frequent diagnoses were bronchiolitis (60.5%) and asthma (23%). Patients received NIV for a median of 43h. Nebulized drugs were administered in 40% of the cases during NIV, and no adverse effects were registered. Using Bayesian statistics, the calculated probability of suffering an adverse effect was 1.3% with helmet and 0.5% with TFM (high density 95% probability intervals). Patients with helmet and nebulized therapy were in more serious condition than those who did not receive nebulization; nevertheless, no differences were observed regarding the need to change to bilevel modality. With TFM, PICU stay was shorter for the same degree of severity (p=0.033), and the NIV failure rate was higher in patients who did not receive inhaled drugs (p=0.024). Conclusions: The probability of suffering an adverse effect related to nebulization is extremely low when using a helmet or TFM. Inhaled therapy with TFM may shorten PICU stay in some patients

Objetivo: Evaluar las consecuencias de la medicación nebulizada en pacientes con ventilación no invasiva (VNI) con mascarilla facial total (MFT) y casco. Diseño: Estudio analítico descriptivo sobre una cohorte prospectiva de pacientes. Ámbito: UCIP de hospital de tercer nivel. Pacientes: Todos los pacientes ingresados en UCIP (muestreo consecutivo) con VNI con casco o MFT durante 29 meses. No se excluyeron pacientes. Intervenciones: Se añadió tratamiento nebulizado según criterio médico. Variables de interés: Independientes: edad, sexo, diagnóstico, gravedad, parámetros ventilatorios y medicación nebulizada (si se utilizaba). Secundarias: duración, fallo de VNI y estancia en UCIP. Resultados: Los diagnósticos más frecuentes fueron bronquiolitis (60,5%) y asma (23%). La mediana de conexión a VNI fue de 43 horas. Se administraron nebulizaciones durante la VNI en un 40% sin registrarse efectos adversos. La probabilidad calculada de tener un efecto adverso fue 1,3% con casco y 0,5% con MFT (estadística bayesiana, intervalo de probabilidad 95%). Los pacientes con casco y aerosolterapia tenían mayor gravedad que los que no recibieron nebulizaciones, sin encontrarse diferencias en la necesidad de cambiar a modalidad con doble nivel de presión. En los pacientes con MFT la estancia en UCIP fue menor (p=0,033) a pesar de no existir diferencias en el nivel de gravedad; la tasa de fallo de VNI fue mayor en los que no recibieron nebulizaciones (p=0,024). Conclusiones: La probabilidad de tener un efecto adverso relacionado con la nebulización es baja utilizando casco o MFT. La terapia inhalada con MFT puede disminuir la estancia en UCIP en algunos pacientes

Respuesta a «Ingeniería de materiales, mechanical power, ventilación protectora y una de paracaídas» / Reply to «Materials engineering, mechanical power, protective ventilation and a parachute»

No disponible